UrbanAI
Adaptive Multi-Layer Urban Flood Resilience Intelligence Platform
14 Global Cities · 6 Rainfall Scenarios · 30-Year Financial Model
Select City
🇮🇳 India Coimbatore Chennai Mumbai Delhi Bengaluru Hyderabad    🌍 Europe / Americas / ME London Amsterdam New York Singapore Dubai    🌏 Asia Tokyo Jakarta Bangkok
Rainfall Scenario
☀️ Light 🌧️ Design Storm ⛈️ Severe 🌊 Extreme 🔴 Climate Stress 🌀 Monsoon Peak
Floodwater Volume
million m³
Hub Clearance
hours
Clearance Saving vs Distributed
%
Total CAPEX
30-Year NPV
Resilience Score
/ 100
City Overview

Population
Urban Area
Ward Count
Base Rainfall
Runoff Coefficient
Hub Count
Hub Capacity
Storage Buffer
Selected Scenario:  
Post-Storage Volume (m³)
Hub Clearance (hours)
Distributed Pump Clearance (hrs)
Financial Snapshot —
Annual Net Benefit ()
Simple Payback (years)
30-Year IRR
System Design Reference

UrbanAI models a four-layer adaptive infrastructure system inspired by empirical analysis of Chennai's flood resilience requirements and validated against global city flood management literature. The platform evaluates ward-hub infrastructure against distributed pump deployment, demonstrating how centralised hub architecture reduces clearance time by routing water through interconnected storage assets — sequential lake drainage, circular underground flow, directional canal systems, and emergency sea discharge pathways — each activated adaptively based on rainfall intensity.

Chennai Reference Model
100 wards · 70 cm design event · 28 billion litres · 2,150 hub pumps replacing 215,000 distributed units
Mumbai Benchmark
Stable to 70 cm · Connected underwater system with sea outfall · Reference architecture for hub-and-canal design
Global Generalisation
Single computation engine parameterised across 14 cities · 4 continents · 5 currencies · 6 extreme rainfall scenarios
L1 — Rainfall Volume Computation
Rainfall (cm at scenario)
Urban Area
Runoff Coefficient
Detention Storage
Post-Storage Volume
Storage Absorption %
L2 — Hub vs Distributed Clearance
Hub Clearance (hours)
Distributed Clearance (hours)
Composite Resilience Score
Overall Score / 100
Hub Clearance Speed (30%)
Storage Efficiency (20%)
Clearance Saving (25%)
Pump Type Optimisation — Per Hub Configuration
Pump Type Capacity Capacity Share Units per Hub Total Fleet (all hubs) Share of Hub Capacity
Note: Pump mix achieves the target hub capacity through a blend of 40% Type D (high-power) + 30% Type C + 20% Type B + 10% Type A (base flow maintenance). Exact procurement mix subject to detailed engineering survey.
Total CAPEX ()
Annual Net Benefit ()
Simple Payback (years)
30-Year NPV ()
30-Year IRR
CAPEX Breakdown
30-Year Cumulative NPV Trajectory
CAPEX Component Breakdown
Component Base Cost Contingency Total
Urban Flood Infrastructure Schematic City: · Scenario: · Risk:
Ward Zone (low risk)
Ward Zone (medium risk)
Ward Zone (high/critical risk)
Pump Hub (●)
Storage/Lake (◯)
Canal/River
Safe Zone / Green Buffer
Infrastructure Layer Activation Map